[tip:perf/urgent] tools: Adopt {READ,WRITE_ONCE} from the kernel
From: tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Mon Jul 06 2015 - 03:32:22 EST
Commit-ID: 728abda6a6654ee7f4e903dc921c6307065e1644
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/728abda6a6654ee7f4e903dc921c6307065e1644
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 14:12:42 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 15:05:00 -0300
tools: Adopt {READ,WRITE_ONCE} from the kernel
We need it to build rbtree.c after this cset:
commit d72da4a4d973
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed May 27 11:09:36 2015 +0930
rbtree: Make lockless searches non-fatal
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-qlnzhezv5ddwst0w9fydju0y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/include/linux/compiler.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/compiler.h b/tools/include/linux/compiler.h
index f0e7267..9098083 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -41,4 +41,62 @@
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+static __always_inline void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
+{
+ switch (size) {
+ case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break;
+ case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break;
+ case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break;
+ case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break;
+ default:
+ barrier();
+ __builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size);
+ barrier();
+ }
+}
+
+static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
+{
+ switch (size) {
+ case 1: *(volatile __u8 *)p = *(__u8 *)res; break;
+ case 2: *(volatile __u16 *)p = *(__u16 *)res; break;
+ case 4: *(volatile __u32 *)p = *(__u32 *)res; break;
+ case 8: *(volatile __u64 *)p = *(__u64 *)res; break;
+ default:
+ barrier();
+ __builtin_memcpy((void *)p, (const void *)res, size);
+ barrier();
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The
+ * compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of
+ * READ_ONCE, WRITE_ONCE and ACCESS_ONCE (see below), but only when the
+ * compiler is aware of some particular ordering. One way to make the
+ * compiler aware of ordering is to put the two invocations of READ_ONCE,
+ * WRITE_ONCE or ACCESS_ONCE() in different C statements.
+ *
+ * In contrast to ACCESS_ONCE these two macros will also work on aggregate
+ * data types like structs or unions. If the size of the accessed data
+ * type exceeds the word size of the machine (e.g., 32 bits or 64 bits)
+ * READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() will fall back to memcpy and print a
+ * compile-time warning.
+ *
+ * Their two major use cases are: (1) Mediating communication between
+ * process-level code and irq/NMI handlers, all running on the same CPU,
+ * and (2) Ensuring that the compiler does not fold, spindle, or otherwise
+ * mutilate accesses that either do not require ordering or that interact
+ * with an explicit memory barrier or atomic instruction that provides the
+ * required ordering.
+ */
+
+#define READ_ONCE(x) \
+ ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
+
+#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
+ ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = { .__val = (val) }; __write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
+
#endif /* _TOOLS_LINUX_COMPILER_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/