Re: [patch] irqchip/dw-apb-ictl: Fix generic domain chip wreckage

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > the following patch seems fix the panic, but I dunno whether it's correct or not,
> > could you please help to check?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jisheng
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > index f4a0e11..8d996cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > @@ -30,13 +30,14 @@
> >  static void dw_apb_ictl_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> >  {
> >  	struct irq_domain *d = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, 0);
> > +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> >  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> >  	int n;
> >  
> >  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> >  
> > -	for (n = 0; n < d->gc->num_chips; n++, gc++) {
> > +	for (n = 0; n < d->gc->num_chips; n++) {
> > +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, n * 32);
> >  		u32 stat = readl_relaxed(gc->reg_base + APB_INT_FINALSTATUS_L);
> 
> Yes it's correct. Seems I tried to be overly clever by avoiding the
> lookup of the second chip. Will fold back.

Hmm. That does not make sense because the real issue is here:

-       for (i = 0; i < nrirqs / 32; i++) {
+       for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(nrirqs, 32); i++) {

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/