Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:

> So the NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE results are very good, almost the same as the 
> baseline with a slight regression at lower RPS and a slight improvement 
> at high RPS.

Good.  I can likely drop the rest then (I like dinky, so do CPUs;).  I'm
not real keen on the feature unless your numbers are really good, and
odds are that ain't gonna happen.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/