Re: [PATCH] base: power: wakeirq: don't leak dev->power.wakeirq

From: Michael Trimarchi
Date: Tue Jul 07 2015 - 00:17:23 EST


Hi

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2015 8:01 PM, "Felipe Balbi" <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > on a first call to dev_pm_attach_wake_irq(), if it
>> > fails, it will leave dev->power.wakeirq set to a
>> > dangling pointer. Instead, let's clear it to make
>> > sure a subsequent call to dev_pm_attach_wake_irq()
>> > has chance to succeed.
>> >
>> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tmlind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> > index 7470004ca810..394d250a1ad8 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> > @@ -50,9 +50,16 @@ static int dev_pm_attach_wake_irq(struct device *dev,
>> int irq,
>> >
>> > err = device_wakeup_attach_irq(dev, wirq);
>> > if (err)
>> > - return err;
>> > + goto err_cleanup;
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > +
>> > +err_cleanup:
>> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
>> > + dev->power.wakeirq = NULL;
>> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
>> > +
>>
>> Why here and not in the fuction that return the error?
>
> because the field was set here, why would I clear it elsewhere ?
>

Clear now and even more from the other patch proposal.

Michael

> --
> balbi



--
| Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV |
| COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 |
| +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
| [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/