Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Tue Jul 07 2015 - 02:22:24 EST

Next message: Christian Gmeiner: "Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Fix warning when HW interrupts are rescheduled by the softirq tasklet"
Previous message: Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong): "[PATCH v2] mtd: nand_bbt: separate struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c"
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wilc1000: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls"
Next in thread: Frans Klaver: "Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:56:57 +0200
>
> Why is this in the body of the email?

Does the canonical patch format support to preserve
specific details about a shown commit by specification
of fields like "Date" and "From" in the message body?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christian Gmeiner: "Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Fix warning when HW interrupts are rescheduled by the softirq tasklet"
Previous message: Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong): "[PATCH v2] mtd: nand_bbt: separate struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c"
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wilc1000: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls"
Next in thread: Frans Klaver: "Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message body"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]