Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> > > >> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > 
> > > []
> > > 
> > > >> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hmmâ Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
> > > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in
> > > >> > > (today's)
> > > >> > > linux-next.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2
> > > >> > -rc1 was
> > > >> > released (which just happened last night)?
> > > >>
> > > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's
> > > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So,
> > > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository?
> > > >
> > > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come
> > > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version
> > > > (which you probably don't want, right?).
> > > >
> > > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be
> > > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem.
> > > 
> > > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches
> > > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are
> > > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what
> > > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your
> > > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series.
> > 
> > Easiest thing for me to do is unapply.
> > 
> > We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued.
> 
> So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy?

Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say
interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about.  However,
we have caught Mike at an awkward time, as he is in the middle of
transitioning jobs.

Perhaps Stephen Boyd (now Cc'ed) might have a look.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/