Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor)
From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Tue Jul 07 2015 - 12:03:50 EST
On 06/07/15 20:52, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/03/2015 07:52 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the review.
On 02/07/15 18:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 06/08, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[...]
+
+ clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &sclk->hw);
+ if (!IS_ERR(clk) && max)
+ clk_set_rate_range(clk, min, max);
Hm.. we're planning to make clk_register() return a struct
clk_hw, so this will block that. We need some sort of clk_hw API
that allows us to setup min/max limits on the clock from the
provider side. Care to add that?
Can you provide pointer to the patches or the tree containing those
changes ? Are they targeted for v4.3 ?
If I have time I may try to start doing the clk_register() conversion,
but it will take a while so I doubt it will be in v4.3. I'm asking if
you can add a clk_hw based API that does something like
clk_set_rate_range() without requiring a struct clk pointer. i.e.
clk_hw_set_rate_range(struct clk_hw *hw, min, max) that constraints the
min/max rate of the clock. This way, the driver is only using clk
provider APIs and not clk consumer APIs.
I understand the intention of separating clk provider helpers/APIs
and clk consumer APIs. Since {min,max}_rate are part of struct clk
itself, I was thinking that you would have moved it to struct clk_core
as part of the rework you mentioned and hence asked about the patches.
IIUC, if {min,max}_rate remain part of struct clk, then how are we
restricting that operation to just the clk providers ? clk consumer
can still directly modify or use clk_set_rate_range.
Do we continue to provide that feature for both provider and consumer ?
If so I assume {min,max}_rate range requested by consumer should be
within the limits set by provider and do we maintain both the limits ?
Sorry if I am missing something fundamental since I don't have much
knowledge of clk layer internals.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/