Re: perf, kprobes: fuzzer generates huge number of WARNings

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:00:12AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> 
> Well the BPF hack is in the fuzzer, not the kernel.  And it's not really a 
> hack, it just turned out to be a huge pain to figure out how to 
> manually create a valid BPF program in conjunction with a valid kprobe 
> event.

You mean automatically generating valid bpf program? That's definitely hard.
If you mean just few hardcoded programs then take them from samples or
from test_bpf ?

> I did have to sprinkle printks in the kprobe and bpf code to find out 
> where various EINVAL returns were coming from, so potentially this is just 
> a problem of printks happening where they shouldn't.  I'll remove those 
> changes and try to reproduce this tomorrow.

could you please elaborate on this further. Which EINVALs you talking about?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/