Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] soc: qcom: Add device tree binding for SMEM

[Stephen Boyd]

On 06/26/2015 02:50 PM, bjorn@xxxxxxx wrote:
> += EXAMPLE
> +The following example shows the SMEM setup for MSM8974, with a main SMEM region
> +at 0xfa00000 and an auxiliary region at 0xfc428000:
> +
> +	reserved-memory {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		smem_region: smem@fa00000 {
> +			reg = <0xfa00000 0x200000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	smem@fa00000 {

This should be smem@fc428000 matching the first reg property. It's weird
though, because if smem is using a secondary region it will be under the
SoC node and have a reg property. Otherwise it would be directly under
the root node and only have a memory-region. It would be nice if we
could somehow move the rpm message ram (0xfc428000) into the
reserved-memory node so that we could use memory-region for both regions.

> +		compatible = "qcom,smem";
> +
> +		memory-region = <&smem_region>;
> +		reg = <0xfc428000 0x4000>;
> +
> +		hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
> +	};


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/