Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters

[Jason Baron]

On 07/09/2015 01:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:04:32PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> So the 'static_key_false' is really branch is initially false. We had
>> a naming discussion before, but if ppl think its confusing,
>> 'static_key_init_false', or 'static_key_default_false' might be better,
>> or other ideas.... I agree its confusing.
> Jason, while I have you here on the subject; mind posting that true/fase
> thing again? That makes more sense than the inc/dec thing for some usage
> sites.
>
>

Ok, sounds good. I will try and get to this next week.

Thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/