Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] kmod: Handle UMH_WAIT_PROC from system unbound workqueue

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 07/09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> The UMH_WAIT_PROC handler runs in its own thread for obsolete reasons.
> We couldn't launch and then wait for the exec kernel thread completion
> without blocking other usermodehelper queued jobs since khelper was
> implemented as a singlthread ordered workqueue.
>
> But now we replaced khelper with generic system unbound workqueues which
> can handle concurrent blocking jobs.
>
> So lets run it from the workqueue.

Probably this is fine, but I am a bit worried...

WQ_MAX_ACTIVE == 512, this should be enough "in practice". But nothing
protects us from creative driver(s) which spawns 512 long-living user
space tasks...

Note also that userpace can ptrace these task and "block" sys_wait()
forever.

I am worried ;)

> CHECK: I'm just worried about the signal handler that gets tweaked
> and also the call to sys_wait() that might fiddle with internals. The
> system workqueue must continue to work without surprise for other
> works.

Yes. This means that this patch is wrong without disallow_signal()
at the end.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/