Hi,
On 09/07/2015 at 18:15:46 +0800, Josh Wu wrote :
As since sama5d3, to reset the chip, we don't need to shutdown the ddrPlease align that line properly.
controller.
So add a new compatible string and new restart function for sama5d3 and
later chips. As we don't use sama5d3 ddr controller, so remove it as
well.
Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
index 36dc52f..8944b63 100644
--- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
+++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ static int at91sam9g45_restart(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static int sama5d3_restart(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
+ void *cmd)
+{That one too.
+ writel(cpu_to_le32(AT91_RSTC_KEY | AT91_RSTC_PERRST | AT91_RSTC_PROCRST),
+ at91_rstc_base);
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;This doesn't scale well. I would create a structure with a pointer to
+}
+
static void __init at91_reset_status(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
u32 reg = readl(at91_rstc_base + AT91_RSTC_SR);
@@ -155,13 +163,13 @@ static void __init at91_reset_status(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id at91_ramc_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-sdramc", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ddramc", },
- { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-ddramc", },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
static const struct of_device_id at91_reset_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9260_restart },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
+ { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-rstc", .data = sama5d3_restart },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
@@ -181,17 +189,21 @@ static int at91_reset_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}
- for_each_matching_node(np, at91_ramc_of_match) {
- at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
- if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not map ram controller address\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ match = of_match_node(at91_reset_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
+ at91_restart_nb.notifier_call = match->data;
+
+ if (match->data != sama5d3_restart) {
the restart function and a boolean or a bitfield to store whether the
workaround is needed. Use that structure in your match data. Then, you
won't need to reorder anything.
+ /* we need to shutdown the ddr controller, so get ramc base */
+ for_each_matching_node(np, at91_ramc_of_match) {
+ at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
+ if (!at91_ramc_base[idx]) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not map ram controller address\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ idx++;
}
- idx++;
}
- match = of_match_node(at91_reset_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
- at91_restart_nb.notifier_call = match->data;
return register_restart_handler(&at91_restart_nb);
}