Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for nvmem providers

From: Srinivas Kandagatla
Date: Fri Jul 10 2015 - 06:39:18 EST


Thanks for quick review,


On 10/07/15 11:29, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:44 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy
review.

Trivial notes:
Will fix all them.

--srini

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c

+struct nvmem_device {
+ const char *name;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
[]
+struct nvmem_cell {
+ const char *name;
+ int offset;
+ int bytes;

It'd be nicer to use consistent indentation for *name
in nvmem_cell

+static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct bin_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
+{
[]
+ count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;

maybe rounddown() ?

+static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct bin_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
+{

+ count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;

and rounddown() here too ?

+static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
+{
+ struct device *d;
+
+ if (!nvmem_np)
+ return NULL;
+
+ d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
+
+ return d ? to_nvmem_device(d) : NULL;
+}

Perhaps more common as

d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
if (!d)
return NULL;

return to_nvmem_device(d);
}

+struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(struct nvmem_config *config)
+{
[]
+ nvmem->read_only = nvmem->dev.of_node ?
+ of_property_read_bool(nvmem->dev.of_node,
+ "read-only") :
+ config->read_only;

odd indentation.
Normally, "read-only" would be aligned with nvmem->dev.of_node,

+ dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n",
+ dev_name(&nvmem->dev));

Isn't this going to have duplicated dev_name prefix and postfix?

+ if (device_create_bin_file(&nvmem->dev,
+ nvmem->read_only ? &bin_attr_ro_nvmem :
+ &bin_attr_rw_nvmem))
+ dev_info(&nvmem->dev, "Failed to create sysfs binary file\n");

Is the KERN_LEVEL correct?
Maybe dev_err/notice/warn/dbg?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/