Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Fri Jul 10 2015 - 17:09:51 EST
On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for
> tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do
> similar. Are there better options?
>
> Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo,
> would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks?
That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote
most of it.
Paolo
> That would probably be the most convenient for merging the consumer code.
> Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/