Re: [3/3] IRQ: Print "unexpected IRQ" messages consistently across architectures

[Michael Ellerman]

On Sun, 2015-12-07 at 22:02:11 UTC, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Many architectures use a variant of "unexpected IRQ trap at vector %x" to
> log unexpected IRQs.  This is confusing because (a) it prints the Linux IRQ
> number, but "vector" more often refers to a CPU vector number, and (b) it
> prints the IRQ number in hex with no base indication, while Linux IRQ
> numbers are usually printed in decimal.
> 
> Print the same text ("unexpected IRQ %d") across all architectures.
> 
> No functional change other than the output text.

There's already a fallback version in asm-generic, so shouldn't you instead
just delete all the versions that are identical to that?

eg. on powerpc we have:

>  static inline void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq)
>  {
> -	printk(KERN_CRIT "unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq);
> +	printk(KERN_CRIT "unexpected IRQ %d\n", irq);
>  }

And the generic version is:

>  #ifndef ack_bad_irq
>  static inline void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int irq)
>  {
> -	printk(KERN_CRIT "unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq);
> +	printk(KERN_CRIT "unexpected IRQ %d\n", irq);
>  }
>  #endif

So we can just delete the powerpc version?

cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/