Re: [PATCH] acpi-cpufreq: Add a miss ifdef CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB

[Pan Xinhui]

hi, Rafeal
	thanks for your reply. :)

On 2015å07æ11æ 04:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB has not been defined, the placeholder for
>> cpb is not needed. Add ifdef around it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> index e7fcaa6..314a19e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -884,7 +884,9 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>  static struct freq_attr *acpi_cpufreq_attr[] = {
>>         &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
>>         &freqdomain_cpus,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB
>>         NULL,   /* this is a placeholder for cpb, do not remove */
>> +#endif
> 
> Adding the ifdef here doesn't change anything, because the next NULL
> will play the role of the one you've just #ifdefed and the structure
> will be filled with zeros from that point on anyway.
> 
Yes, adding ifdef here does not change any binary codes. But I want to make the codes more readable. :)
Patch author has noticed two *NULL* here would confuse people, especially who first read this acpi-cpufreq.c file
>From code style point, it would be better to have #ifdef around it. 

> You'd need to #ifdef it in the struct freq_attr definition, but I'm
> not sure it's worth the effort.
> 

struct freq_attr *cpb* is defined in #ifdef section. :)

thanks
xinhui

>>         NULL,
>>  };
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/