Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Print "unexpected IRQ" messages consistently across architectures
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Jul 13 2015 - 03:14:49 EST
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Many architectures use a variant of "unexpected IRQ trap at vector %x" to
> log unexpected IRQs. This is confusing because (a) it prints the Linux IRQ
> number, but "vector" more often refers to a CPU vector number, and (b) it
> prints the IRQ number in hex with no base indication, while Linux IRQ
> numbers are usually printed in decimal.
>
> Print the same text ("unexpected IRQ %d") across all architectures.
>
> No functional change other than the output text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Thanks!
> arch/m68k/include/asm/hardirq.h | 2 +-
For m68k:
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
And it looks like m68k can switch to the asm-generic version afterwards...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/