Re: [PATCH] Input: pmic8xxx-pwrkey - Support shutdown

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Mon 06 Jul 18:08 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On pm8xxx PMICs, shutdown and restart are signaled to the PMIC
> via a pin called PS_HOLD. When this pin goes low, the PMIC
> performs a configurable power sequence. Add a .shutdown hook so
> that we can properly configure this power sequence for shutdown
> or restart depending on the system state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c | 287 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 280 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/pmic8xxx-pwrkey.c

[..]

>  
>  /**
>   * struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey - pmic8xxx pwrkey information
>   * @key_press_irq: key press irq number
> + * @regmap: device regmap

Please also document the shutdown_fn.

>   */
>  struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey {
>  	int key_press_irq;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	int (*shutdown_fn)(struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *, bool);
> +};
> +
> +struct pm8xxx_nbs {
> +	int (*shutdown_fn)(struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *, bool);
>  };

This struct is unused.

[..]

>  static struct platform_driver pmic8xxx_pwrkey_driver = {
>  	.probe		= pmic8xxx_pwrkey_probe,
>  	.remove		= pmic8xxx_pwrkey_remove,
> +	.shutdown	= pmic8xxx_pwrkey_shutdown,

I tried to find pros/cons of using this approach instead of register a
reboot notifier like I did in the pm8941 driver, but I haven't come up
with any good reason to pick one or the other.

>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "pm8xxx-pwrkey",
>  		.pm	= &pm8xxx_pwr_key_pm_ops,

With above nits I think this looks good.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/