Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] time: Add the common weak version of update_persistent_clock()

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Xunlei Pang wrote:

> From: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The weak update_persistent_clock64() calls update_persistent_clock(),
> if the architecture defines a update_persistent_clock64() to replace
> and remove its update_persistent_clock() version, the compiler will

s/compiler/linker/ right?

> throw an undefined symbol error, that is, any arch that switches to
> update_persistent_clock64() will have this issue.
> 
> So, we should add the common weak update_persistent_clock().

Are we adding it or should we add it?
 
Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/