[PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: Drop cpufreq_policy_restore()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jul 27 2015 - 09:44:13 EST
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Notice that when cpufreq_policy_restore() is called, its per-CPU
cpufreq_cpu_data variable has been already dereferenced and if that
variable is not NULL, the policy local pointer in cpufreq_add_dev()
contains its value.
Therefore it is not necessary to dereference it again and the
policy pointer can be used directly. Moreover, if that pointer
is not NULL, the policy is inactive (or the previous check would
have made us return from cpufreq_add_dev()) so the restoration
code from cpufreq_policy_restore() can be moved to that point
in cpufreq_add_dev().
Do that and drop cpufreq_policy_restore().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 44 +++++++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1092,28 +1092,6 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct
return 0;
}
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
- read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
-
- if (likely(policy)) {
- /* Policy should be inactive here */
- WARN_ON(!policy_is_inactive(policy));
-
- down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- policy->cpu = cpu;
- policy->governor = NULL;
- up_write(&policy->rwsem);
- }
-
- return policy;
-}
-
static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(struct device *dev)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -1226,7 +1204,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
int ret = -ENOMEM;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;
- bool recover_policy = !sif;
+ bool recover_policy;
pr_debug("adding CPU %u\n", cpu);
@@ -1244,18 +1222,18 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
/* Check if this CPU already has a policy to manage it */
policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
- if (policy && !policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+ if (policy) {
WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus));
- ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
+ return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
- /*
- * Restore the saved policy when doing light-weight init and fall back
- * to the full init if that fails.
- */
- policy = recover_policy ? cpufreq_policy_restore(cpu) : NULL;
- if (!policy) {
+ /* This is the only online CPU for the policy. Start over. */
+ recover_policy = true;
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ policy->cpu = cpu;
+ policy->governor = NULL;
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ } else {
recover_policy = false;
policy = cpufreq_policy_alloc(dev);
if (!policy)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/