Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add scaling frequency range support
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Jul 28 2015 - 19:51:37 EST
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 12:53:33 PM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> hi, Viresh
> thanks for your reply :)
> On 2015å07æ28æ 12:29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 28-07-15, 11:32, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Userspace at most time do cpufreq tests very much inconveniently.
> >> Currently they have to echo min and max cpu freq separately like below:
> >> echo 480000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
> >> echo 2240000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> >>
> >> Add scaling_freq_range cpufreq attr to support userspace's demand.
> >> Therefore it's easier for testers to write readable scripts like below:
> >> echo 480000-2240000 >
> >> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_freq_range
> >
> > I don't think this brings any good change, we already have support for
> > that with min/max freqs and I don't see how scripts can be less
> > readable with that.
> >
> yes, min/max are supported, however it is inconvenient. sometime it's very easy to cause obscure bugs.
> For example, some one might write a script like below.
> echo 480000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
> echo 960000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> .....//other works
> echo 1120000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
> echo 2240000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
> ...//other works
>
> But it did not work when we echo 112000 to min-freq, as the current max freq is smaller than it.
> It's hard to figure it out in a big script... we have many such scripts.
Fix them, then, pretty please.
And adding this attribute is not going to magically fix them, is it?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/