Re: [PATCH 0/4] enable migration of driver pages

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:55:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:49:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:35:15PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
> > > My ARM-based platform occured severe fragmentation problem after long-term
> > > (several days) test. Sometimes even order-3 page allocation failed. It has
> > > memory size 512MB ~ 1024MB. 30% ~ 40% memory is consumed for graphic processing
> > > and 20~30 memory is reserved for zram.
> > > 
> > 
> > The primary motivation of this series is to reduce fragmentation by allowing
> > more kernel pages to be moved. Conceptually that is a worthwhile goal but
> > there should be at least one major in-kernel user and while balloon
> > pages were a good starting point, I think we really need to see what the
> > zram changes look like at the same time.
> 
> I think gpu drivers really would be the perfect candidate for compacting
> kernel page allocations. And this also seems the primary motivation for
> this patch series, so I think that's really what we should use to judge
> these patches.
> 
> Of course then there's the seemingly eternal chicken/egg problem of
> upstream gpu drivers for SoCs :(

I recognised that the driver he had modified was not an in-tree user so
it did not really help the review or the design. I did not think it was
very fair to ask that an in-tree GPU driver be converted when it would not
help the embedded platform of interest. Converting zram is both a useful
illustration of the aops requirements and is expected to be beneficial on
the embedded platform. Now, if a GPU driver author was willing to convert
theirs as an example then that would be useful!

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/