Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] block: Correct misuses of 0x%<decimal>

[yalin wang]

> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:03, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 15:25 +0800, yalin wang wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 04:25, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Correct misuse of 0x%d in logging messages.
>>> 
> []
>> why not use like this : dev_dbg(&h->pdev->dev, "   Max outstanding 
>> commands = %#x\nâ  ? 
>> %#x will add 0x prefix automatically .
> 
> It's generally a consistency thing.
> A 0 value would be emitted as 0 and not 0x0.
> 
i try on my ubuntu , 

 static int __init throtl_init(void)                                                                                                           
  {                                                                                
         printk("module init test: %#x %p\n", 0, (void *)0x123);                  
          return 0;                                                                   
                                                                                    
  }                                                                                   
                                                                                      
  module_init(throtl_init); 

#uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 09:43:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

#dmesg
[259356.375586] module init test: 0x0 0000000000000123

it seems donât need 0x%x for 0, just need %#x for all numbers.
there are lots of use like this, i can change them if needed:

# egrep -r  -i '0x%\d*x'  .  | wc -l 
11776


Thanks






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/