Re: [patch 2/7] x86/lguest: Do not setup unused irq vectors

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > +
> > +	/* Some systems map "vectors" to interrupts weirdly.  Not us! */
> > +	__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + irq, irq);
> 
> Missing ].

Doh.

> [   17.751889] do_IRQ: 0.33 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
> 
> You broke interrupts :(

Right, because I missed the other place which fiddles with
interrupts. Does the patch below fix the issue?

Thanks,

	tglx
---------------->
Index: tip/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
@@ -841,8 +841,7 @@ static int lguest_enable_irq(struct pci_
 
 	/* We literally use the PCI interrupt line as the irq number. */
 	pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &line);
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(line, &lguest_irq_controller,
-				      handle_level_irq, "level");
+	lguest_setup_irq(line);
 	dev->irq = line;
 	return 0;
 }




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/