[tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Order pv_unhash() after cmpxchg() on unlock slowpath

From: tip-bot for Will Deacon
Date: Mon Aug 03 2015 - 13:00:50 EST


Commit-ID: 3b3fdf10a8add87ef0050138d51bfee9ab4983df
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3b3fdf10a8add87ef0050138d51bfee9ab4983df
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:58:30 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:57:09 +0200

locking/pvqspinlock: Order pv_unhash() after cmpxchg() on unlock slowpath

When we unlock in __pv_queued_spin_unlock(), a failed cmpxchg() on the lock
value indicates that we need to take the slow-path and unhash the
corresponding node blocked on the lock.

Since a failed cmpxchg() does not provide any memory-ordering guarantees,
it is possible that the node data could be read before the cmpxchg() on
weakly-ordered architectures and therefore return a stale value, leading
to hash corruption and/or a BUG().

This patch adds an smb_rmb() following the failed cmpxchg operation, so
that the unhashing is ordered after the lock has been checked.

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
[ Added more comments]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150713155830.GL2632@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index 489a878..ab8b1bb 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -244,13 +244,17 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
if (!lp) { /* ONCE */
lp = pv_hash(lock, pn);
/*
- * lp must be set before setting _Q_SLOW_VAL
+ * We must hash before setting _Q_SLOW_VAL, such that
+ * when we observe _Q_SLOW_VAL in __pv_queued_spin_unlock()
+ * we'll be sure to be able to observe our hash entry.
*
- * [S] lp = lock [RmW] l = l->locked = 0
- * MB MB
- * [S] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL [L] lp
+ * [S] pn->state
+ * [S] <hash> [Rmw] l->locked == _Q_SLOW_VAL
+ * MB RMB
+ * [RmW] l->locked = _Q_SLOW_VAL [L] <unhash>
+ * [L] pn->state
*
- * Matches the cmpxchg() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
+ * Matches the smp_rmb() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
*/
if (!cmpxchg(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, _Q_SLOW_VAL)) {
/*
@@ -306,6 +310,15 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
}

/*
+ * A failed cmpxchg doesn't provide any memory-ordering guarantees,
+ * so we need a barrier to order the read of the node data in
+ * pv_unhash *after* we've read the lock being _Q_SLOW_VAL.
+ *
+ * Matches the cmpxchg() in pv_wait_head() setting _Q_SLOW_VAL.
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ /*
* Since the above failed to release, this must be the SLOW path.
* Therefore start by looking up the blocked node and unhashing it.
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/