Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace

From: Takao Indoh
Date: Mon Aug 03 2015 - 21:03:33 EST


On 2015/08/03 18:44, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 12:08, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:03:13PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>> Takao Indoh <indou.takao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Even though TOPA_SHIFT happens to be the same as PAGE_SHIFT, it is a
>>> property of a separate hardware block, not mmu. PAGE_SHIFT is 12, but
>>> 12 is not always PAGE_SHIFT.
>>
>> PAGE_SHIFT is _always_ 12 on x86. Changing that will require changing
>> the page table format, a rather unlikely thing to go happen.
>
> Of course. Yet that doesn't justify turning every 12 into PAGE_SHIFT
> is what I'm saying.
>
> Oh, look, it's PAGE_SHIFT o'clock on x86, time for lunch. :)

I thought the base address of output region is page aligned. I took a
look at Intel SDM again, it just says the base address is 4K-aligned
physical address, does not mention page size. So, logically TOPA_SHIFT
and PAGE_SHIFT are different things and I'll remove this change in next
version.

Thanks,
Takao Indoh

>
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/