Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: add support for switchdev FDB objects

From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue Aug 04 2015 - 11:43:14 EST


Hi Scott,

On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:18 AM, Scott Feldman sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Vivien Didelot
> <vivien.didelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Remove the fdb_{add,del,getnext} function pointer in favor of new
>> port_fdb_{add,del,getnext}.
>>
>> Implement the switchdev_port_obj_{add,del,dump} functions in DSA to
>> support the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB objects.
>>
>> These functions are called from switchdev_port_bridge_{get,set,del}link.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6171.c | 3 -
>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6352.c | 3 -
>> include/net/dsa.h | 16 ++--
>> net/dsa/slave.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>>
>
> [cut]
>
>> static int dsa_slave_bridge_port_join(struct net_device *dev,
>> struct net_device *br)
>> {
>> @@ -765,9 +776,9 @@ static const struct net_device_ops dsa_slave_netdev_ops = {
>> .ndo_change_rx_flags = dsa_slave_change_rx_flags,
>> .ndo_set_rx_mode = dsa_slave_set_rx_mode,
>> .ndo_set_mac_address = dsa_slave_set_mac_address,
>> - .ndo_fdb_add = dsa_slave_fdb_add,
>> - .ndo_fdb_del = dsa_slave_fdb_del,
>> - .ndo_fdb_dump = dsa_slave_fdb_dump,
>> + .ndo_fdb_add = switchdev_port_fdb_add,
>> + .ndo_fdb_del = switchdev_port_fdb_del,
>> + .ndo_fdb_dump = switchdev_port_fdb_dump,
>> .ndo_do_ioctl = dsa_slave_ioctl,
>> .ndo_get_iflink = dsa_slave_get_iflink,
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>> @@ -775,11 +786,17 @@ static const struct net_device_ops dsa_slave_netdev_ops =
>> {
>> .ndo_netpoll_cleanup = dsa_slave_netpoll_cleanup,
>> .ndo_poll_controller = dsa_slave_poll_controller,
>> #endif
>> + .ndo_bridge_getlink = switchdev_port_bridge_getlink,
>> + .ndo_bridge_setlink = switchdev_port_bridge_setlink,
>> + .ndo_bridge_dellink = switchdev_port_bridge_dellink,
>> };
>
> These ndo_bridge_xxx changes aren't relevant to the patch, are they?
> You'll need those for VLANs but not for FDBs.

You're right, that is part of my next HW VLAN patchset. I removed them.
I also use ether_addr_copy instead of memcpy, as suggested by
checkpatch.pl.

A v2 is ready, I'll wait a bit for eventual other reviews though.

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/