RE: [PATCH V3 3/5] perf,tools: Dump per-sample freq/CPU%/CORE_BUSY% in report -D
From: Liang, Kan
Date: Tue Aug 04 2015 - 13:07:52 EST
> Em Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:43:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:53:29PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > switch (event->header.type) {
> > > > case PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE:
> > > > - dump_sample(evsel, event, sample);
> > > > if (evsel == NULL) {
> > > > ++evlist->stats.nr_unknown_id;
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > + dump_sample(session, evlist, evsel, event, sample);
> > >
> > > same here, you could pass only session all the way through
> >
> > I'll take a look at how interesting it would be to have a
> > evsel->evlist, that if NULL means the evsel is freestanding, but when
> > it is linked to an evlist, then it will be there. This way we wouldn't
> > have to pass (evlist, evsel) when the main purpose of a function is
> > about an evsel but we need information that is logically associated to
> > all evsels in a list, i.e. that is in evsel->evlist.
>
> There are no cases where a function receives (evsel, evlist) with that evlist
> containing that evsel :-\
>
> Perhaps this will be the first, i.e. rename perf_session_env to perf_env,
> then store it in evlist->env, then when processing something where we
> have a evsel or evlist we can access that env from:
>
> evsel->evlist->env;
>
> Will continue after lunch, trying to prototype what I just described.
>
Hi Arnaldo,
Have you got a chance to implement the prototype for evlist->env?
Thanks,
Kan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/