Re: [PATCH] CMA: Don't return a valid cma for non-cma dev

[Feng Tang]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:28:03PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05 2015, Feng Tang wrote:
> > that for a system which needs multiple cma heaps (like for security
> > reason), they may have to share one struct device *dev, as in
> > ion_cma_heap_create()
> 
> If you need several CMA areas to allocate from, create multiple struct
> devices.

Yes, that's my thought too. The normal cma case for SOCs are one platform
device is created in drivers/staging/android/ion/xxx_ion.c, then that
device's pointer will be transferred into ion_cma_heap_create() inside
of the struct ion_platform_heap data.

And it's not easy to create multiple platform devices. And it may be
better to give each cma_heap one dedicated device in struct ion_cma_heap
which could be used as a parameter for 
	dma_alloc_from_contigous() --> cma_alloc()

Thanks,
Feng
 
> -- 
> Best regards,                                         _     _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science,  MichaÅ âmina86â Nazarewicz    (o o)
> ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/