Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] drm: exynos/dp: fix code style
From: Yakir Yang
Date: Thu Aug 06 2015 - 11:21:35 EST
Joe,
å 2015/8/6 23:05, Joe Perches åé:
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 09:04 -0500, Yakir Yang wrote:
make checkpatch.pl script happy
That should not be the primary reason to submit a patch.
Making it easier for human code reader to understand
what the code does should be though.
Thanks for your reply, but I do think that fix code style and make
checkpatch.pl passed is my primary reason to submit this patch. I can't
think out more directly words ;( ,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
[]
@@ -123,10 +123,11 @@ static int exynos_dp_read_edid(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
dev_dbg(dp->dev, "EDID data includes a single extension!\n");
/* Read EDID data */
- retval = exynos_dp_read_bytes_from_i2c(dp, I2C_EDID_DEVICE_ADDR,
- EDID_HEADER_PATTERN,
- EDID_BLOCK_LENGTH,
- &edid[EDID_HEADER_PATTERN]);
+ retval =
+ exynos_dp_read_bytes_from_i2c(dp, I2C_EDID_DEVICE_ADDR,
+ EDID_HEADER_PATTERN,
+ EDID_BLOCK_LENGTH,
+ &edid[EDID_HEADER_PATTERN]);
This is a relatively uncommon style.
Because the code uses relatively long variable and
function names as well as longish macro #defines,
prefer to ignore the 80 column limit.
Okay, I think it would be better to modify like those:
retval = exynos_dp_read_bytes_from_i2c(
dp, I2C_EDID_DEVICE_ADDR,
EDID_HEADER_PATTERN,
EDID_BLOCK_LENGTH,
&edid[EDID_HEADER_PATTERN]);
Is it okay ?
- Yakir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/