Re: [PATCH v8 00/21] Compile-time stack validation

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 12:23:32PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:07:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > This is v8 of the compile-time stack validation patch set, based on the
> > > tip/master branch.
> > > 
> > > The frame pointer macros are still called FRAME and ENDFRAME because I
> > > don't think we converged on anything else yet.  Otherwise I tried to
> > > address all the other review comments from v7.
> > 
> > So I think:
> > 
> > 	FRAME_START
> > 	FRAME_END
> 
> (One last tweak to the bikeshed)
> 
> The antonym of END is BEGIN.  So how about:
> 
>   FRAME_BEGIN
>   FRAME_END

Ok, so thesaurus.com reminds me that words can have more than one
antonym, and that START and BEGIN are both antonyms of END.

Personally, when I START something I usually FINISH it or even STOP it.

So I'll stop the bikeshedding I started and go with BEGIN/END.

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/