From: ZhengShunQian <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>No, thats not true. NVMEM does not mandate anything, it give more flexibity to providers instead.
Always enable the clock of efuse256. Base on the nvmem framework,
it seems like there is not a good way to enable the clock
when actual needed.
--
Signed-off-by: ZhengShunQian <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 2 +-
include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
index 0df5bae..84d9218 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3288_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
GATE(0, "pclk_efuse_1024", "pclk_cpu", 0, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 2, GFLAGS),
GATE(PCLK_TZPC, "pclk_tzpc", "pclk_cpu", 0, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 3, GFLAGS),
GATE(PCLK_UART2, "pclk_uart2", "pclk_cpu", 0, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 9, GFLAGS),
- GATE(0, "pclk_efuse_256", "pclk_cpu", 0, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 10, GFLAGS),
+ GATE(PCLK_EFUSE256, "pclk_efuse_256", "pclk_cpu", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 10, GFLAGS),
GATE(PCLK_RKPWM, "pclk_rkpwm", "pclk_cpu", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, RK3288_CLKGATE_CON(11), 11, GFLAGS),
/* ddrctrl [DDR Controller PHY clock] gates */
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
index c719aac..ab74d5e 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@
#define PCLK_DDRUPCTL1 366
#define PCLK_PUBL1 367
#define PCLK_WDT 368
+#define PCLK_EFUSE256 369
/* hclk gates */
#define HCLK_GPS 448