Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa
Date: Mon Aug 10 2015 - 07:50:14 EST


Zang MingJie <zealot0630@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here comes several options:
> 1. reject local next hop w/ EINVAL
> 2. delete route when local next hop removed

Will also cause some people to complain.

> 3. transition between RT_SCOPE_HOST amd RT_SCOPE_LINK

I don't understand the scope transition. I know Alex mentioned it for
the first time. Maybe he can explain?

> 4. document it

I prefer that one :)

> which one should we choose ?
> 1 will definitely cause compatibility problem


> 2 is the easiest solution

Will definietely cause some people to complain.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at