Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table

[Hannes Frederic Sowa]

Hello,

Zang MingJie <zealot0630@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here comes several options:
>
> 1. reject local next hop w/ EINVAL
> 2. delete route when local next hop removed

Will also cause some people to complain.

> 3. transition between RT_SCOPE_HOST amd RT_SCOPE_LINK

I don't understand the scope transition. I know Alex mentioned it for
the first time. Maybe he can explain?

> 4. document it

I prefer that one :)

> which one should we choose ?
>
> 1 will definitely cause compatibility problem

Agreed.

> 2 is the easiest solution

Will definietely cause some people to complain.

Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/