Question about SCHED_DEADLINE and sched_yield() usage
From: Michael Riesch
Date: Mon Aug 10 2015 - 16:53:21 EST
Hi all,
I connected two analog-to-digital converters to a BeagleBoneBlack (with
kernel version 3.14.33-ti-r51.2) and tried to use the deadline scheduler
to get samples at a constant rate. In my C++/Qt application the ADCs are
represented by a class which is derived from QThread. The run() method
is basically:
run()
{
unsigned int flags;
struct sched_attr attr;
attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE;
attr.sched_runtime = 600 * 1000;
attr.sched_deadline = 1250 * 1000;
attr.sched_period = 1250 * 1000;
sched_setattr(0, &attr, flags);
while (active) {
/* code that gets a sample from adc, takes around 500 ms */
sched_yield();
}
}
to get samples at a rate of 800 Hz. However, once sched_yield() is
called, the threads do not seem to be scheduled again (no samples are
acquired and when the application shuts down the threads remain as zombies).
As far as I understand, I have to call sched_yield() if the the
execution time of one loop iteration is either not constant or unknown
(both cases being very likely), because if I do not, a new loop
iteration could be started if the time budget is not empty.
Have I missed something? Any ideas or alternative approaches are welcome!
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best regards, Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/