Re: [PATCH 2/6] PM / OPP: restructure _of_init_opp_table_v2()

[Stephen Boyd]

On 08/11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-08-15, 17:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > So ret is 0. I thought it was an error path, but I guess this is a
> > warning path and we return 0 still?
> 
> Urg ..

Oh I see this is an existing problem... Same problem goes for the
count check. It may be better to fix those two cases first and
then do this cleanup. But I don't mind either way.

> 
> -------------------------8<-------------------------
> 
> Message-Id: <d0e8a9cd6b0fb38fa946cb6274f258d7aa66c00e.1439259818.git.viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:57:36 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: restructure _of_init_opp_table_v2()
> 
> 'dev_opp' will always be NULL in _of_init_opp_table_v2() after creating
> OPPs for a device. There is no point comparing it against NULL there.
> 
> Restructure code a bit to make it more efficient.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/