Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization contributions of dying tasks

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:58:48PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:39:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > You add extra code the hot dequeue path for something that 'never'
> > happens. We have the sched_class::task_dead call for that.
> 
> I don't mind using sched_class::task_dead() instead. The reason why I
> didn't go that way is that we have to retake the rq->lock or mess with
> cfs_rq::removed_load instead of just not adding the utilization in
> the first place when we have the rq->lock.
> 
> Anyway, it is probably redundant by now. I will check Yuyang's code to
> see if he already fixed this problem.

He did, he used the removed_load stuff, same as migration does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/