Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev FDB objects

[David Miller]

From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)

> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
> 
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>> 
>>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>>>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
>>> 
>>> I never will rewrite history, ever.
>>> 
>>> Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
>> 
>> Sorry, I still don't understand. What are the consequences of:
>> 
>>     git revert -m 1 f1d5ca4
>> 
>> Then applying v3?
> 
> In this scenerio I think a relative fixup works better.
> 
>> You already did that in the past:
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1f2cd84
> 
> Each and every situation is evaluated by me on a case by case
> basis.

Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/