Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Dienstag, 11. August 2015, 15:34:09 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> > > 
> > > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
> > 
> > To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> > any news since that mail.
> > 
> > I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> > situation worse for the time being).
> 
> Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
> to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
> clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
> patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
> tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
> can merge the defer part.

great :-)

For the defer-part you came up with a better solution than mine anyway, if I 
remember correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/