Re: [PATCH 11/20] regmap: _regmap_raw_read: Add handling of busses without bus->read()

[Markus Pargmann]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:27:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:12:36PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * There are busses that do not have a read function as it is optional.
> > +	 * Use their reg_read function instead if the requested number of bytes
> > +	 * is correct.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!map->bus->read) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * bus_reg_read() does not support reading values that are not
> > +		 * exactly the size of format.val_bytes
> > +		 */
> > +		if (val_len != map->format.val_bytes)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		return _regmap_bus_reg_read(map, reg, val);
> > +	}
> 
> No, this makes no sense - if the device doesn't have a read operation
> then it doesn't support a raw data stream and hence can't support raw
> access sensibly.  Callers that want to access a lot of registers at once
> without knowing what the wire format for the device is should be using
> the bulk or multi interfaces.

Yes okay. Then I will reduce this patch to the following and put it
into regmap_read() instead?
	if (!map->bus->read) {
		return -EINVAL;

Is -EINVAL the right thing to return or would you prefer -ENOTSUPP?

Thanks,

Markus

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature