RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fix init_vp_index() for reloading hv_netvsc

[Dexuan Cui]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 22:11
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: olaf@xxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx;
> driverdev-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: fix init_vp_index() for reloading
> hv_netvsc
> 
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:35:07PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:29:46PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > > > > This fixes the recent commit:
> > > > > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Further improve CPU affiliation logic
> > >
> > > Since you are redoing this anyway, include the git hash so we can look
> > > it up.  In fact, just use the Fixes tag.
> > >
> > > dan carpenter
> >
> > Hmm, I didn't read your mail in time and sent out V2 just now... :-)
> >
> > I'm working on the latest linux-next (next-20150810).
> > I didn't add the git hash ID because I think the hash of the patch of the
> > same content can be different in different trees (like Greg's tree and
> > linux-next)?
> 
> Sometimes it can change, but mostly it doesn't.  In this case it didn't.
> 
> The commit hash is based on the tree, the parent, and the content of the
> patch description.  If we rebase, add a new signed-off-by or merge
> the patch through a different tree then the hash changes.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Thanks a lot for the explanation, Dan!

I'll remember to add the hash in future.

-- Dexuan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/