Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 16/46] sched: Allocate and initialize energy data structures

[Dietmar Eggemann]

On 12/08/15 11:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:23:59PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> +
>> +	sge->nr_idle_states = fn(cpu)->nr_idle_states;
>> +	sge->nr_cap_states = fn(cpu)->nr_cap_states;
>> +	memcpy(sge->idle_states, fn(cpu)->idle_states,
>> +	       sge->nr_idle_states*sizeof(struct idle_state));
>> +	memcpy(sge->cap_states, fn(cpu)->cap_states,
>> +	       sge->nr_cap_states*sizeof(struct capacity_state));
> 
>> +			if (fn && fn(j)) {
>> +				nr_idle_states = fn(j)->nr_idle_states;
>> +				nr_cap_states = fn(j)->nr_cap_states;
>> +				BUG_ON(!nr_idle_states || !nr_cap_states);
>> +			}
> 
>> +	for_each_cpu(i, &mask) {
>> +		int y;
>> +
>> +		BUG_ON(fn(i)->nr_idle_states != fn(cpu)->nr_idle_states);
>> +
>> +		for (y = 0; y < (fn(i)->nr_idle_states); y++) {
>> +			BUG_ON(fn(i)->idle_states[y].power !=
>> +					fn(cpu)->idle_states[y].power);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		BUG_ON(fn(i)->nr_cap_states != fn(cpu)->nr_cap_states);
>> +
>> +		for (y = 0; y < (fn(i)->nr_cap_states); y++) {
>> +			BUG_ON(fn(i)->cap_states[y].cap !=
>> +					fn(cpu)->cap_states[y].cap);
>> +			BUG_ON(fn(i)->cap_states[y].power !=
>> +					fn(cpu)->cap_states[y].power);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> Might it not make more sense to have:
> 
> 	const struct blah *const blah = fn();
> 
> and use blah afterwards, instead of the repeated invocation of fn()?

Absolutely! I can change this in the next release.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/