Re: [PATCH V10] fixup: audit: implement audit by executable

[Paul Moore]

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:19:44 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/08/12, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:48:48 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Do you plan to push this fix to next?
> > 
> > Patience.  Yes, I'll be pushing this to next sometime this week; as usual
> > I'll send mail when I do.
> 
> Ok, no problem, I'm not rushing.  I was unsure what your intentions were
> or whether there was more to do to help it happen.

It's merged.  I still don't know why I'm seeing that error, but the patch is 
obviously correct so I'm just going to merge it anyway and chalk it up to some 
compiler/sparse oddity.

As far as patch follow-ups, if you haven't heard back from me after four days 
or so (yes, that is as arbitrary as it sounds), it isn't a bad idea to send a 
follow-up, especially if it is a critical patch, to make sure I've seen the 
patch (things do occasionally fall through the cracks).  However, if it is 
only been a day or two and I haven't responded, rest assured I've likely seen 
your patch I'm just dealing with something else at the moment and haven't had 
the time to review/comment/merge your patch.

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/