Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Aug 13 2015 - 17:07:22 EST
On 07/27/2015 10:29 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> modify_ldt has questionable locking and does not synchronize
> threads. Improve it: redesign the locking and synchronize all
> threads' LDTs using an IPI on all modifications.
> This will dramatically slow down modify_ldt in multithreaded
> programs, but there shouldn't be any multithreaded programs that
> care about modify_ldt's performance in the first place.
... except 32-bit programs compiled with one specific version of glibc.
Do we care? I don't think so.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/