Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties
From: Heiko Stuebner
Date: Wed Aug 19 2015 - 02:20:01 EST
Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 16:28:06 schrieb Brian Norris:
> Now that I'm looking a little closer, it seems like other existing DTS's
> are broken too, then. Jerry looks like it was converted to the
> regulator-state-mem node binding, but the conversion doesn't seem to
> make sense when I compare the chromium DTS sources with the for-next
> source I see in your tree.
>
> In -next:
>
> regulators {
> mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> regulator-always-on;
> regulator-boot-on;
> regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-state-mem {
> regulator-on-in-suspend;
> };
> };
> };
>
> But chromium had:
>
> regulators {
> mic_vcc: LDO_REG2 {
> regulator-always-on;
> regulator-boot-on;
> regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> regulator-name = "mic_vcc";
> regulator-suspend-mem-disabled;
> };
> };
>
> So I guess I'll make the proper conversion for all the veyron variants I
> see.
great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)
The original regulator-state changes did happen when we had this suspend
instability (counter and gpioint stuff) and I did go with the values similar to
the rk3288-evb, as this was the only one resuming at all at the time. So I
guess I never looked to closesly what it did, as long as the system came out
of suspend sucessfully again :-)
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/