On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:52, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some edp screen with no hpd signal would need some delay timeThen, this delay has a dependency on the "rk3288 sdk" board.
to ensure that screen would be ready for work, so we can expand
the delay time in hpd detect function, it works prefectly on my
rk3288 sdk board.
Also, if the delay time is expanded, the booting time of some Exybos boards will be increased unnecessarily. :-(
So, please add new DT property such as 'hpd-delay' that can be added to board DT files.
If there is not that DT property in DT files, the default value '10' will written to a variable such as 'unsigned int hpd_delay'.
If there is the DT property in DT files, the delay value will written to the variable when parsing DT values
and will be used in analogix_dp_detect_hpd().
What I want to say is that there should not be harmful effect on the existing Exynos boards, due to unrelated reasons.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
index 99870f7..75dd44a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int analogix_dp_detect_hpd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
return 0;
timeout_loop++;
- usleep_range(10, 11);
+ usleep_range(100, 110);
}
/*
--
1.9.1