Re: [PATCH] [v2] x86, suspend: Save/restore extra MSR registers for suspend

[Pavel Machek]

On Sun 2015-08-23 08:20:33, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri 2015-08-21 19:53:34, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > A bug is reported(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227208)
> > > that, after resuming from S3, CPU is working at a low speed.
> > > After investigation, it is found that, BIOS has modified the value
> > > of THERM_CONTROL register during S3, changes it from 0 to 0x10,
> > > while the latter means CPU can only get 25% of the Duty Cycle,
> > > and this caused the problem.
> > > 
> > > Simple scenario to reproduce:
> > > 1.Boot up system
> > > 2.Get MSR with address 0x19a, it should output 0
> > > 3.Put system into sleep, then wake up
> > > 4.Get MSR with address 0x19a, it should output 0(actual it outputs 0x10)
> > > 
> > > Although this is a BIOS issue, it would be more robust for linux to deal
> > > with this situation. This patch fixes this issue by introducing a framework
> > > for saving/restoring specify MSR registers(THERM_CONTROL in this case)
> > > on suspend/resume.
> > > 
> > > When user finds a problematic platform that requires save/restore MSRs,
> > > he can simply add quirk in msr_save_dmi_table, and customizes MSR
> > > registers in quirk callback, for example:
> > > 
> > > unsigned int msr_id_need_to_save[] = {MSR_ID0, MSR_ID1, MSR_ID2...};
> > > 
> > > and system ensures that, once resumed from suspend, these MSR indicated
> > > by IDs will be restored to their original values before suspend.
> > > 
> > > Since both 64/32-bit kernels are affected, this patch covers 64/32-bit
> > > common code path. And because the MSR ids specified by user might not be
> > > available or readable in any situation, we use rdmsrl_safe to safely
> > > save these MSR registers.
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Marcin Kaszewski <marcin.kaszewski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> 
> So I like the general structure of the patch and I like the MSR saving mechanism 
> it introduces, but it is full of typos and small stylistic uncleanlinesses which 
> need to be fixed before this patch can be applied. Please don't ack incomplete 
> patches.

Plus, I acked V2 when V3 was available.

I was under impression it was a regression, so "slightly urgent", but
it looks that was wrong impression, too.

Sorry,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/