Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix dl bandwidth of root domain overflow after dl task dead

[Juri Lelli]

Hi,

On 30/08/15 12:25, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On 8/10/15 10:10 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> On 06/08/15 09:39, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> Hi Juri,
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 2015-05-06 16:14 GMT+08:00 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>>:
>>>
>>>      Hi Wanpeng,
>>>
>>>      I finally got to review this, sorry about the huge delay.
>>>
>>>      On 07/04/2015 04:36, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>      > The total used dl bandwidth of each root domain will be reset to 0 after
>>>      > cpu hotplug when rebuild sched domains, since the call path is:
>>>      >
>>>      > _cpu_down
>>>      >   cpuset_cpu_inactive()
>>>      >     cpuset_update_active_cpus()
>>>      >       partition_sched_domains()
>>>      >         build_sched_domains()
>>>      >           init_rootdomain()
>>>      >             init_dl_bw()
>>>      >
>>>      > The bandwidth which dl task occupy will be released when dl task dead,
>>>      > it will be minus from total used dl bandwidth of its root domain,
>>>      > however, bandwidth overflow occurs since total used dl bandwidth is 0.
>>>      >
>>>
>>>      Right, that's a bug.
>>>
>>>      > This patch fix it by attaching the bandwidth which dl task occupy to
>>>      > the new root domain when the task is migrating since cpu hotplug, and
>>>      > attach all the used dl bandwidth of dl tasks to the new root domain
>>>      > when sched domains are rebuild.
>>>      >
>>>
>>>      But, I think this fix has still a couple of problems:
>>>
>>>       - what happens if a DL task is simply sleeping when domains are
>>>         reconfigured?
>>>
>>>       - def_root_domain has now multiple accounting problems, as you do
>>>         this thing even when a cpu is moved there in the cpuoff path
>>>
>>>      Also, runqueue (and throttling) information are dynamic, while we
>>>      are trying to fix a static problem. It's probably not a good idea
>>>      mixing them.
>>>
>>>      I'm not sure how (I need more time to think it through), but can
>>>      we maybe fix this using cpuset information?
>>>
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>> Yes, actually. I might have a different fix, but I'd like to play with
>> it a bit more as it is a bit too intrusive. Let me see if I can come
>> up with something that I can share.
> 
> Ping Peter, Juri, any detail ideas to help me post another version of my 
> patch? ;-)
> 

Let me see if I'm able to post my version of the fix before
end of this week ;).

Thanks!

- Juri

> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Juri
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wanpeng Li
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>      Thanks,
>>>
>>>      - Juri
>>>
>>>      > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>      <mailto:wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>      > ---
>>>      >  kernel/sched/core.c     |  1 +
>>>      >  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>      >  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
>>>      >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>>      >
>>>      > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>      > index 28b0d75..c940999 100644
>>>      > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>      > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>>      > @@ -5586,6 +5586,7 @@ static void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq,
>>>      struct root_domain *rd)
>>>      >       rq->rd = rd;
>>>      >
>>>      >       cpumask_set_cpu(rq->cpu, rd->span);
>>>      > +     attach_dl_bw(rq);
>>>      >       if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq->cpu, cpu_active_mask))
>>>      >               set_rq_online(rq);
>>>      >
>>>      > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>      > index 5e95145..62680d7 100644
>>>      > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>      > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>>      > @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static void dl_task_offline_migration(struct
>>>      rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>>      >  {
>>>      >       struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
>>>      >       bool fallback = false;
>>>      > +     struct dl_bw *dl_b;
>>>      >
>>>      >       later_rq = find_lock_later_rq(p, rq);
>>>      >
>>>      > @@ -258,6 +259,11 @@ static void dl_task_offline_migration(struct
>>>      rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>>      >       set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu);
>>>      >       activate_task(later_rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
>>>      >
>>>      > +     dl_b = dl_bw_of(later_rq->cpu);
>>>      > +     raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
>>>      > +     __dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw);
>>>      > +     raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
>>>      > +
>>>      >       if (!fallback)
>>>      >               resched_curr(later_rq);
>>>      >
>>>      > @@ -1776,6 +1782,25 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq,
>>>      struct task_struct *p,
>>>      >               switched_to_dl(rq, p);
>>>      >  }
>>>      >
>>>      > +void attach_dl_bw(struct rq *rq)
>>>      > +{
>>>      > +     struct rb_node *next_node = rq->dl.rb_leftmost;
>>>      > +     struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
>>>      > +     struct dl_bw *dl_b;
>>>      > +
>>>      > +     dl_b = dl_bw_of(rq->cpu);
>>>      > +     raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
>>>      > +next_node:
>>>      > +     if (next_node) {
>>>      > +             dl_se = rb_entry(next_node, struct sched_dl_entity,
>>>      rb_node);
>>>      > +             __dl_add(dl_b, dl_se->dl_bw);
>>>      > +             next_node = rb_next(next_node);
>>>      > +
>>>      > +             goto next_node;
>>>      > +     }
>>>      > +     raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
>>>      > +}
>>>      > +
>>>      >  const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
>>>      >       .next                   = &rt_sched_class,
>>>      >       .enqueue_task           = enqueue_task_dl,
>>>      > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>>      > index e0e1299..a7b1a59 100644
>>>      > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>>      > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>>>      > @@ -1676,6 +1676,7 @@ extern void init_dl_rq(struct dl_rq *dl_rq);
>>>      >
>>>      >  extern void cfs_bandwidth_usage_inc(void);
>>>      >  extern void cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec(void);
>>>      > +void attach_dl_bw(struct rq *rq);
>>>      >
>>>      >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
>>>      >  enum rq_nohz_flag_bits {
>>>      >
>>>
>>>      --
>>>      To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>>      linux-kernel" in
>>>      the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>      <mailto:majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>      Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/