Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for ST's Remote Processor Controller driver

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt    | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..fbd7d78
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> > +STMicroelectronics Remote Processor
>>
>> "remote processor" is what STM datasheets call them? This seems like
>> Linux naming is leaking in here.
>
> That's what this directory is called and the other binding within it.

That doesn't make it right or answer my question. Certainly our
directory structure too closely mirrors the kernel.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/