Re: [PATCH 2/3] rhashtable-test: retry insert operations in threads
From: Phil Sutter
Date: Tue Sep 01 2015 - 08:46:55 EST
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:43:00PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:00:12PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > The variable would be used to track if the worker has failed to allocate
> > memory in background.
> > Since the failing insertion will be retried, subsequent inserts are not
> > necessary unrelated.
> If an insertion fails it is never retried. The only thing that is
> retried is the expansion of the table. So I have no idea what
> you are talking about.
This is not an inherent behaviour of the implementation but general
agreement. The insertion may fail non-permanently (returning -EBUSY),
users are expected to handle this by retrying the operation.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/