Re: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers?

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Sep 1, 2015 6:53 PM, "Brian Gerst" <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all-
> >
> > Linux has a handful of weird features that are only supported for
> > backwards compatibility.  The big one is the x86_64 vsyscall page, but
> > uselib probably belongs on the list, too, and we might end up with
> > more at some point.
> >
> > I'd like to add a way that new programs can turn these features off.
> > In particular, I want the vsyscall page to be completely gone from the
> > perspective of any new enough program.  This is straightforward if we
> > add a system call to ask for the vsyscall page to be disabled, but I'm
> > wondering if we can come up with a non-syscall way to do it.
> >
> > I think that the ideal behavior would be that anything linked against
> > a sufficiently new libc would be detected, but I don't see a good way
> > to do that using existing toolchain features.
> >
> > Ideas?  We could add a new phdr for this, but then we'd need to play
> > linker script games, and I'm not sure that could be done in a clean,
> > extensible way.
>
>
> The vsyscall page is mapped in the fixmap region, which is shared
> between all processes.  You can't turn it off for an individual
> process.

Why not?

We already emulate all attempts to execute it, and that's trivial to
turn of per process.  Project Zero pointed out that read access is a
problem, too, but we can flip the U/S bit in the pgd once we evict
pvclock from the fixmap.

And we definitely need to evict pvclock from the fixmap regardless.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/